Abstract
As Law is a legal system that regulates the external conduct of people, inspired by the postulates of justice and legal certainty, which regulates social coexistence, it has a higher normative category or rank, in relation to Biolaw. Since the latter only responds to new needs derived from scientific and technological progress, related to the new possibilities of manipulation of human life. In relation to the principles, it is to be seen that the principle of legitimacy of the Law is preeminent to the principles of Biolaw. Thus safeguarding the legitimacy, not only of the legal system, but also of the correctness of the application of Biolaw. On the other hand, the purpose of law is broader and more basic than the purpose of Biolaw. Since the latter only covers a way of seeing and providing a solution to current problems. And in turn, the Law, shares principles and legal institutions. Biolaw must be regulated normatively and constitutionally, according to its subordinate nature to law. Biolaw must be understood and applied in all cases, in accordance with the legitimacy and fundamental rights to which all living beings are entitled. The purpose of Biolaw should not be placed before or superimposed on the purpose of law. Biolaw, as an emerging legal discipline, deals with the legal and ethical implications of biotechnological and medical advances. Its relationship with fundamental rights is intrinsic, since many of its principles are based on the protection and guarantee of these rights in the area of life, health and physical integrity. It is not a relationship of simple overlapping, but a complex interaction where fundamental rights act as pillars on which Biolaw is built, while Biolaw redefines and expands them in the context of the new biomedical realities. In sum, Biolaw presents itself as a field in constant evolution, where the interpretation and application of fundamental rights are crucial to ensure a responsible and ethical biomedical development that benefits humanity without compromising the values that sustain it.References
ALZAMORA VALDEZ, Mario. Introducción a la ciencia del derecho. Novena edición, Lima: Eddili, 1984.
BIBLIOTECA DEL CONGRESO NACIONAL DE CHILE. La Sociedad, el Derecho y el Pensamiento Político. En línea, recuperado en fecha 1/10/2024 de:
https://www.bcn.cl/formacioncivica/detalle_guia?h=10221.3/45670. Santiago.
LANDA ARROYO, César. Los derechos fundamentales. En línea, recuperado
en fecha 1/10/2024 de: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/
https://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/bitstream/handle/123456789/170363/
Los%20derechos%20fundamentales.pdf. Lima, 2017.
MENDOZA, Héctor. Bioderecho y derechos humanos: Principios fundamentales. En línea, recuperado en fecha 1/10/2024 de: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://archivos.juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/libros/13/6170/22a.pdf. Ciudad de México, 2020.
NARANJO, Gloria Patricia. Principios generales del bioderecho. En línea, recuperado en fecha 1/10/2024 de: https://revistas.upb.edu.co/index.php/derecho/
article/view/4170/3866. Medellín, 2004.
SALCEDO HERNÁNDEZ, José Ramón. Qué es el Bioderecho. En línea, recuperado en fecha 1/10/2024 de: https://revistas.um.es/bioderecho/bec#:~:text=La%20Ciencia%20del%20Bioderecho&text=Solucionar%20los%20conflictos%20desde%20planteamientos,sustentado%20por%20los%20Derechos%20
Humanos. Murcia.
UNIVERSIDAD INTERNACIONAL DE LA RIOJA. ¿Qué son los principios generales del derecho?. En línea, recuperado en fecha 1/10/2024 de: https://www.
unir.net/derecho/revista/principios-generales-derecho/. La Rioja. 2024.
VALDÉS, Erick. Bioderecho, daño genético y derechos humanos de cuarta generación. En línea, recuperado en fecha 1/10/2024 de: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/bmdc/v48n144/
v48n144a10.pdf. Ciudad de México. 2015.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 ESMAT Magazine