Counting on more than 200 participants over three days of intense debates, the IV Seminar on Public Policies for the Adequate Treatment of Conflicts and the 5th Meeting of the Judicial Centers for Conflict Resolution (CEJUSCs) ended this Friday (27th). The events were transmitted by the School of Judges of Tocantins (ESMAT).
On the second day of the lecture, having Judge Silvana Maria Parfieniuk as coordinator of the panel, Judge Alexandre Abreu - coordinator of the Conflict Resolution Center of the Court of Justice of Maranhão (NUPEMEC/TJMA) - spoke, in the Modular System for Conflict Treatment and Technological Innovations in the Consensual Solution lecture, about the necessary investments for the improvement of the conflict management system. "A great concern of the conciliation culture is the maturation, making the person become an active subject in the solution of his conflicts, and it doesn't happen if he imagines that, with the conciliation center, he will substitute the adjudicated solution, that is, if before he delegated to the judge, now he has the mediator as that person that will make the problem to be solved. Therefore, we need to start to a new investment line, which is the investment in the person", he said.
On the third and last day, with Judge Cledson José Dias as coordinator of the panel, Judge Roberto Portugal Bacellar, of the Paraná Court of Justice (TJPR), gave a lecture on Dispute System Design and reminded the legal professionals about the objective of conflict resolution, which is the final destination. The magistrate also dealt with the differences between the judicial process and the process of conflict resolution. "Each step has to work with three stages: action, reflection, action, all the time, because otherwise we will get nowhere. I have my doubts if we can talk about stages of mediation, because the judicial process is done in stages. Imagine a wheel that can only turn forward, because if it goes back it will have a chock that holds it. That is preclusion. There is no way to go back. In a judicial process, if you forget to argue something, you can't advance. In consensus methods, we have a purpose that is not rigid in relation to the rules of the game, but it is rigid in the process of autonomy of people's will, because that is the goal. If they want a solution, they go after that solution," he said.
Concluding another event, in the EaD modality, transmitted by Esmat, the si-multaneos brought discussions about the challenges of the Brazilian Judiciary before the adjustments imposed by the pandemic and the adaptation to videoconference tools in conflict mediation.
