In a meeting based on dialog about innovation in the Judicial System, Justice Marco Villas Boas, General Director of the Superior School of the Judges of the State of Tocantins (Esmat) and President of the Permanent College of Directors of State Schools of Magistracy (Copedem), held a strategic meeting last Tuesday (April 30th) in the city of São Paulo (SP) with the leader of the public sector area for Latin America at Google Cloud, Milton Larsen Burgese.
The main objective of the meeting was to start negotiations for courses and seminars on the use of AI for human development, as well as to discuss possibilities for using generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies to support and practice repetitive procedural acts that do not require complex solutions.
In addition to Justice Marco Villas Boas, General Director of Esmat, the visit was also attended by Justice Ângela Issa Haonat, the Deputy Director of the School; Ana Beatriz de Oliveira Pretto, Executive Directo of Esmat; Victoria Oliveira, executive of the Google Cloud in Latin America; and Lourdes Gonçalves, CEO of Memory – Center of Legal Memory.
About the Ai in the Judiciary
Justice Marco Villas Boas highlighted the importance of the partnership between Copedem, Esmat and Google Cloud, saying that the use of technologies such as Artificial Intelligence can mean an advance in the agility and quality of the services provided by the judiciary, speeding up judicial activities, as well as encouraging the emergence of new digital support tools through the Stricto Sensu Professional Master's Degree Program in Judicial Provision and Human Rights, promoted by Esmat in partnership with the Federal University of the State of Tocantins. He stressed that training magistrates and civil servers in the judiciary of the State of Tocantins to use these tools will be fundamental to the success of this initiative.
The use of AI in the execution of judicial procedures must be guided by ethics and caution, but the Judiciary must train its members and staff to better understand the potential of these tools, so as not to become obsolete. In addition, the implementation of these technologies can help reducing costs and increasing stability and transparency in the judicial system.
